Connect with us

World

Controversial Plans for Stables Raise Concerns Over Historic Burial Ground

Editorial

Published

on

Plans to convert rural stables into a family home have sparked significant concerns regarding their potential impact on a historic Quaker burial ground in Alveston, located on Greenhill Lane. The burial site, in continuous use since the 17th century, is cherished for its serene countryside setting, which is central to Quaker traditions.

Recently, a family received approval from South Gloucestershire Council to transform the stables next to the burial ground into a three-bedroom residence. The decision by the development management committee, which passed with a vote of six to three, has raised alarm among local residents and Quaker representatives about the implications for the burial ground, deemed “nationally important.”

Local Quaker leader Paul Whitehouse expressed his concerns, emphasizing the significance of silence during funerals within Quaker practices. He stated, “What’s important to remember is that Quakers worship principally in silence, and when a funeral takes place, the silence that we have hitherto enjoyed in that burial ground—save perhaps for the birdsong—will no longer be possible.” Whitehouse underscored that maintaining the tranquil environment is crucial for the community’s ability to honor their deceased.

During the council meeting, Conservative Councillor Matthew Riddle, representing the Severn Vale ward, highlighted the unique historical significance of the burial ground. “It’s not only one of the very few Quaker burial grounds still in use, but also with a very long local history spanning hundreds of years and set in a wonderful, quiet, rural environment. It’s a pure gem for many reasons and an important part of our local heritage,” Riddle said.

The proposed plans do not involve constructing new buildings; rather, they focus solely on converting the existing stables into a family home. The family currently cares for three horses on the property, which they aim to keep close to their children for therapeutic benefits. To address concerns about privacy and noise, the family plans to plant three hornbeam trees along the boundary separating their home from the burial ground.

Representing the family, planning agent Will Collins read a letter from applicants Holly and Alan Mitchell, who articulated their intentions. The letter stated, “We’re a family with disabled children, and our intention to convert the stables is driven by a genuine need to provide a supportive and nurturing environment for our children who have emotional, social, and mental health needs. Living in close proximity to the horses on site is particularly important to us, as their presence is incredibly nurturing and therapeutic for our children.”

The Mitchells expressed their commitment to working with the community to ensure their plans address the needs and concerns of their neighbors. As discussions continue, the future of the stables and their conversion remains a focal point of contention between local families and the Quaker community.

As the situation develops, the community is urged to remain engaged and informed, with local news outlets providing updates on further proceedings and discussions.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.