Connect with us

Politics

Plan for Social Housing in North Belfast Moves Forward Despite Opposition

Editorial

Published

on

A contentious proposal for social housing in North Belfast has received approval from the Belfast City Council Planning Committee, despite facing significant opposition from local residents. The plan entails demolishing existing buildings at 733 and 735 Antrim Road to construct two new social housing blocks featuring a total of 34 units. This development is aimed at providing accommodation specifically for individuals aged over 55.

The approved project, submitted by Mr. J Ogle of S4S Developments Ltd, comprises two detached buildings, each ranging from three to four storeys. Additionally, the plan includes 34 car parking spaces, four of which are designated for disabled users. The units will consist of 30 two-bedroom apartments designed for three occupants and four one-bedroom units suitable for two occupants, all of which will be wheelchair accessible.

Local Opposition and Concerns

Despite the council’s approval, the proposal has generated considerable objection from nearby residents. A total of 22 letters of opposition were submitted, citing concerns about the demolition of existing structures, potential overdevelopment, and negative impacts on light and privacy. Critics argue that the proposed height and density of the buildings are inconsistent with the character of the surrounding area.

One representative for the objectors emphasized that the area maintains a low-density profile, averaging 19 dwellings per hectare, whereas the new development would result in over 89 dwellings per hectare. Residents have also expressed worries about the environmental impact, particularly concerning existing trees, increased traffic, and a perceived lack of adequate public consultation.

The Belfast City Council’s planning report noted that the site is considered suitable for residential development, making effective use of previously developed land. The report highlights that there is a significant need for social housing in North Belfast, where there is only one social housing unit within a 500-metre radius. The closest housing estate is nearly 1 kilometre away, and the nearest estate designated for those in housing need is almost 2 kilometres from the site.

Support from Officials and Future Implications

The Northern Ireland Housing Executive has expressed support for the social housing initiative, while NI Water raised objections due to concerns about insufficient network capacity. The report from council planning officers stated that the design of the proposal has been refined through negotiations to ensure quality and compatibility with the area.

Councillor JJ Magee of Sinn Féin proposed that planning permission be granted, and the motion was unanimously approved by the committee. The planning report acknowledged that while current demand for elderly accommodation is lower compared to other demographics, the new development is expected to attract elderly residents from larger family homes, thereby freeing up such housing for families in need.

The decision to proceed with the development underscores the urgent demand for social housing in North Belfast, balancing community needs with development pressures. As the project moves forward, its impact on both the local environment and community dynamics will be closely monitored.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.