Connect with us

Science

Six Stoke-on-Trent Areas Named Among England’s Most Deprived

Editorial

Published

on

Research has identified six neighbourhoods in Stoke-on-Trent as among the most deprived areas in England. This designation comes from a study commissioned by the Local Trust, which collaborated with Oxford Consultants for Social Inclusion (OCSI) to analyze the impact of social infrastructure on these communities.

The initial research, released in 2020, identified a total of 206 “left behind” neighbourhoods across England. This figure was adjusted to 225 following updates to the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). The wards highlighted in Stoke-on-Trent include Abbey Hulton, Bentilee and Ubberley, Blurton West and Newstead, Meir North, Meir South, and Tunstall.

According to the Local Trust, these areas are characterized by a lack of essential services and facilities, which contributes to significantly poorer socio-economic outcomes compared to other similarly deprived regions. The study emphasized that social infrastructure—defined as community spaces, connectivity, and engagement—plays a crucial role in determining the prospects of these neighbourhoods.

Understanding the Challenges of Deprivation

The Local Trust’s research indicates that neighbourhoods classified as “doubly disadvantaged” face a multitude of challenges, including higher rates of poverty, lower educational attainment, and poorer health outcomes. This compounded disadvantage is particularly evident in areas that have not received fair investment over the years.

The research utilized two main indices: the IMD, produced by the Government, and the Community Needs Index (CNI), which was developed through collaboration between the Local Trust and OCSI. By merging these indices, the study was able to pinpoint neighbourhoods suffering from both severe deprivation and inadequate social infrastructure.

Interestingly, the report noted a scarcity of “left behind” neighbourhoods in London and other major urban centres. While these areas also experience deprivation, a richer variety of social infrastructure mitigates community need, as assessed by the CNI.

Government Support and Future Initiatives

In a move aimed at addressing these disparities, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer launched the £5 billion Pride in Place programme in March 2023. This initiative allocates £20 million over the next decade to 169 communities, including Meir North, which will receive £2 million annually.

Sir Keir emphasized the importance of investing in communities, stating, “We’re investing in the UK’s future, by backing the true patriots that build our communities up in neighbourhoods across every corner of the country.” He highlighted the need for local involvement in decision-making regarding fund allocation, giving power back to residents who understand their communities best.

This new funding initiative follows the recent designation of Bentilee and Ubberley as a “trailblazer” neighbourhood within the same programme. Such efforts aim to rejuvenate areas that have long struggled with deprivation and lack of investment.

In summary, the identification of these six neighbourhoods in Stoke-on-Trent underscores ongoing challenges related to deprivation and social infrastructure. With government initiatives like the Pride in Place programme, there is hope for improved outcomes in these communities, but the need for continuous investment and local engagement remains critical.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.