Donald Trump Claims to End Nonexistent War Between Cambodia and Armenia

Former President Donald Trump made headlines recently with an audacious claim regarding international conflict resolution. Speaking at the American Cornerstone Institute Founder’s Dinner on September 21, 2025, Trump asserted that he had successfully stopped a war between Cambodia and Armenia, a statement that has drawn widespread criticism and ridicule.

Trump characterized the purported conflict as “just starting” and described it as a significant issue. His comments were intended to project an image of diplomatic success, a hallmark of his political rhetoric. However, the assertion raised eyebrows and sparked immediate backlash, especially considering that there has never been a war between Cambodia and Armenia, which are separated by approximately 6,600 kilometers.

Social media quickly lit up with reactions, many of which highlighted the absurdity of Trump’s statement. Critics pointed out the geographical disconnect and questioned the feasibility of a conflict between the two nations. One user remarked, “This guy is truly insane,” while another humorously suggested that the war might have been conducted over Zoom, with Trump mistakenly believing he had ended it by simply “leaving the call.”

The responses varied from incredulous to sarcastically humorous. For instance, some users noted that Trump’s reference to Armenia was a rare occurrence, joking that he avoided mentioning Azerbaijan, likely due to its complexity. Others quipped about the imaginary nature of the war, suggesting it was the “first war fought with telekinesis.”

This latest episode adds to a growing list of controversial statements made by Trump regarding foreign policy. His tendency to claim credit for resolving conflicts has become a recurring theme, often met with skepticism. Critics argue that such claims undermine the seriousness of international relations and can lead to misunderstandings.

While the former president continues to maintain a loyal following, incidents like this one illustrate the challenges he faces in the political landscape. The public’s reaction serves as a reminder of the scrutiny that accompanies Trump’s every word, especially when it comes to matters of foreign affairs.

As this episode unfolds, it raises questions about the impact of misinformation and the importance of accurate discourse in political dialogue. The reactions underscore a fundamental expectation from public figures: the need for factual representation, especially when discussing sensitive topics like war and peace.