Fox News Host Calls for Destruction of UN After Trump Incident

A controversial statement from Fox News host Jesse Watters has sparked outrage after he suggested bombing the United Nations building in New York City. This remark followed an incident where former President Donald Trump encountered a malfunctioning escalator at the UN, which Watters described as an “insurrection.”

The incident occurred on September 23, 2025, when Trump was preparing to address the General Assembly. As he stepped onto the escalator, it unexpectedly stopped. Watters, visibly upset, claimed that the malfunction was a deliberate act of sabotage against the former president. “This is an affront to the Commander in Chief,” he stated, implying that the UN had orchestrated the event to undermine Trump.

However, it was later revealed that the escalator malfunction was triggered by a member of Trump’s own team, who inadvertently activated the stop mechanism. A UN official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, confirmed that the White House was operating the teleprompter for Trump at the time of the incident.

Watters’ call for extreme measures has drawn significant backlash. He suggested in a broadcast that the United Nations should face severe consequences for this supposed slight against Trump. His comments come on the heels of another controversial statement from fellow Fox News host Brian Kilmeade, who previously suggested using lethal injections on homeless individuals.

Critics have taken to social media to express their outrage. Many questioned how Watters could call for such violence while other television hosts faced consequences for less aggressive comments. Tweets from various users highlighted a perceived double standard in media accountability, particularly when it comes to rhetoric from Fox News.

One Twitter user remarked, “Watters just made a terrorist threat of political violence on American soil.” This sentiment was echoed by multiple commentators who argued that such statements should not go without repercussions. Concerns have also been raised about the implications of suggesting violence against an international institution located on U.S. soil.

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is being urged to investigate these remarks, with users highlighting the need for accountability for media figures who promote violent rhetoric. Responses ranged from calls for Watters to be held accountable to broader discussions about free speech and media responsibility.

As the situation develops, responses from Fox News remain to be seen. Critics continue to question the network’s stance on violent rhetoric, especially in light of the serious nature of Watters’ comments regarding the UN. The discourse surrounding this incident reflects ongoing tensions in the media landscape, particularly regarding political commentary and its potential impact on public perception and safety.

In the wake of these events, the broader implications for political discourse and media responsibility are likely to be subjects of continued scrutiny. The reactions to Watters’ comments reveal a growing concern about the normalization of extreme rhetoric in political discussions and its potential consequences.