Ioan Gruffudd Secures Five-Year Restraining Order Against Alice Evans

Ioan Gruffudd achieved a significant legal victory on March 5, 2026, when a Los Angeles judge extended a domestic violence restraining order against his ex-wife, Alice Evans, for an additional five years. This ruling marks a critical moment in the ongoing court battle between the former couple, which has been characterized by allegations of harassment and emotional abuse.

During the court proceedings, Judge Michael Convey stated that Evans had engaged in a “concerted, focused, intentional and caustic campaign of denigration” against Gruffudd and his current wife, Australian actress Bianca Wallace. Gruffudd, 52, and Evans, 57, have been embroiled in a contentious dispute since their separation in early 2021, which culminated in a final divorce in 2023.

The judge emphasized the emotional toll of Evans’s actions, noting they had isolated Gruffudd from his children, Ella, 16, and Elsie, 12. He remarked on a specific incident where Evans confronted Gruffudd in front of their daughters, expressing intentions to “Amber Heard” him. This phrase references a high-profile case involving accusations of domestic abuse and has become emblematic of serious allegations within relationships.

Evans admitted in court that she had posted derogatory content about Gruffudd and Wallace online, expressing feelings of shame and regret for her actions. Despite her apologies, Judge Convey highlighted the numerous violations of the original restraining order which mandated she remain at least 100 feet away from Gruffudd and Wallace and refrain from negative comments about them online.

The judge’s decision to renew the restraining order was influenced by a series of incidents that demonstrated Evans’s ongoing harassment. He referred to her actions as “emotional abuse” and “coercive control,” stating they posed a legitimate threat to Gruffudd’s and Wallace’s safety. Furthermore, he warned Evans that any future violations could result in criminal prosecution and urged her to seek therapy.

Gruffudd’s attorney, Joseph Langlois, spoke to the media following the ruling, expressing hope that this decision would mark a turning point for Evans. He stated, “You have to start somewhere, and this is a start for Alice to correct her life.” Langlois detailed the severe implications of Evans’s online harassment, which included death threats directed at Wallace and their infant daughter, Mila, born in November 2025.

Evans’s legal representative, Janina Verano, argued against the restraining order’s renewal, suggesting that Evans has made significant changes in her life and ceased her abusive behavior. Verano claimed that Evans’s online presence had diminished, asserting that she has deactivated her Twitter account. However, the judge was not convinced that Evans’s expressions of remorse were genuine or indicative of a change in behavior.

This ruling is just one part of a larger legal battle, as Gruffudd and Evans must also address disputes over child and spousal support. Gruffudd currently pays $1,500 monthly in spousal support and $3,000 for child support, but he is contesting these payments, arguing that he has already overpaid Evans by nearly $400,000.

As the trial progresses, both parties are urged by the court to find a constructive way to co-parent their daughters, who have reportedly been affected by the ongoing conflict between their parents. The next phase of the trial will address financial disputes, highlighting the ongoing challenges both Gruffudd and Evans face as they navigate their post-marital relationship.

In conclusion, the extension of the restraining order reflects the serious nature of the allegations involved and underscores the complexities of co-parenting in a contentious environment. The court’s decision aims not only to protect Gruffudd and Wallace but also to encourage a path toward healthier interactions for all parties involved.