Local Residents Protest Loss of Long-Used Pathway Near Loseley Estate

A popular field-side path that has served local residents for decades has been blocked by the Loseley Estate, sparking considerable backlash from the community. The estate’s management claims the move is necessary to prevent crop damage and enhance wildlife habitats, but many locals remain unconvinced.

The path, located along the northern edge of fields on the south side of the Hog’s Back, has long been a favoured route for dog walkers and those seeking picturesque views of the Surrey Hills. Although it is not classified as a public right of way, its frequent use by the community has made its closure particularly contentious.

Access points to the path have been obstructed by branches cut from a nearby hedgerow, creating barriers that prevent residents from using the route. This has caused frustration among regular users, with some expressing their dissatisfaction while navigating longer detours.

Community Reaction and Political Involvement

Cllr Angela Goodwin of the Liberal Democrats has received numerous complaints from constituents regarding the estate’s actions. On February 11, 2024, she communicated her concerns to the estate’s management and plans to meet with them next week, alongside a representative from the St Catherine’s Village Association (SCVA). Goodwin aims to discuss community needs and find a resolution that benefits both residents and the estate.

Lorimer Burn, chair of the SCVA, echoed these sentiments in a letter to local media, highlighting the distress caused to neighbouring communities, including Guildown, Wodeland Avenue, and Onslow Village. Burn noted that an agreement established around 15 years ago permitted local use of the path, although it did not confer an official right of way.

Responses from Loseley Estate and Local Residents

In response to concerns raised by residents, the estate manager outlined in a correspondence that ongoing maintenance and improvements within the estate are aimed at enhancing wildlife habitats. “We are currently improving several areas within the estate… and hopefully enhancing the wildlife habitat, including the area you have mentioned,” the estate manager reported.

Despite these assurances, residents like Caroline Coleman have expressed disappointment at the abrupt blocking of the path. Coleman remarked that the actions taken by Loseley Estate are disheartening, particularly given the prior agreement that allowed for community access. “If this work is indeed for wildlife, then why eliminate the hedgerow?” she questioned.

The estate’s actions are reminiscent of a previous incident last year when residents in Compton protested against extensive tree felling in Bummoor Copse, which, despite public outcry, proceeded after receiving approval from the Forestry Commission.

As tensions continue, local leaders and residents remain hopeful that their concerns will be addressed in upcoming discussions with the estate management. The fate of the path, and the community’s access to it, remains uncertain as both sides prepare for dialogue.